IMAGING TO STAGE : Finished 4... - Prostate Cancer N...

Prostate Cancer Network

4,941 members3,076 posts

IMAGING TO STAGE

steinmother profile image
6 Replies

Finished 44 treatments over 78 days. Hormone Lupron and Casodex. Gleason 6/7 with lymph node found on 3 tesla MRI. CT guided biopsy of node positive. So Stage III. 80 Centigray to prostate external beam and 60 to lymph node. PSA was only 7-8 pre treatment. Had I not had the MRI, I would be Stage IIb. Imaging for nodes is not a routine in staging apparently so how many Stage II are really Stage III since no imaging is done during staging? Routine staging is bone density and bone scan. Should imaging be part of the staging for all patients? Difference between Stage II and III is difference between local disease and metastatic. That's big. What do you think?

Written by
steinmother profile image
steinmother
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
Read more about...
6 Replies
MelbourneDavid profile image
MelbourneDavid

There is a clinical trial in Australia to see if staging using Ga68 PSMA PET gives a long term benefit. It's not obvious because it's not clear whether extra treatment for the detected nodes affects long term survival - will the cancer have other micrometastises?

Men who have recurrence other than in the prostate bed probably were under-staged.

steinmother profile image
steinmother in reply to MelbourneDavid

Thanks. My point is that either CT or MRI of pelvis and abdomen can show these nodes when bone scan is neg. My small node (1.4x1.8 cm) was needle biopsied. Then the question was what treatment? There have been no trials in this situation. Because nobody is looking for nodes on initial staging routinely. Do you give it a boost? Do you look in the upper abdomen? Even if the treatment is unchanged, which I doubt, wouldn't the patient want to know if he already has mets? Trials are underway to determine at what point chemo is started. Surely the presence of nodal mets would influence that decision. Again, thanks.

MelbourneDavid profile image
MelbourneDavid in reply to steinmother

Good move the biopsy on the enlarged node. They can at lest hit that mode with some extra radiation.

I do think Multipatametric MRI to guide treatment is valuable. My surgeon had one done which showed the extracapsular extension so he cut wider and got it all. Likewise radiation can target what is known much.more effectively than when it is not known.

CT and bone scans seem routine after diagnosis. My urologist didn't hesitate. Remained stage II after those although I wonder if scans were sensitive enough to tell the whole story.

steinmother profile image
steinmother in reply to

Was the CT for staging or for treatment planning? Gold seed location? Or a true CT for pelvic and abdominal abnormalities? I had a CT during treatment planning but it did not cover the enlarged node. Glad you are Stage II and not III. My MRI was ordered by the radiation oncologist not urologist.

bobdc6 profile image
bobdc6

CT scanning is routine at Provision Proton (Knoxville). I had both a bone scan and a whole body CT scan showing no mets. My abdominal lymph nodes were treated anyway.

G 4+ 5

You may also like...

Imaging Guidelines - Salvage IMRT Planning

dynamic MRI imaging, I'm worried that using CT guided imaging alone -as is used in my treatment...

Is there any way to image NATUROPATHIC SUCCESS?

21st century and do imaging first. That came back positive with some 6 and 7 Gleasons, and one......

FDA Approves another PSMA PET scan for Prostate Cancer Imaging

onclive.com/view/fda-approves-tlx591-cdx-for-prostate-cancer-imaging Like the other two PSMA PET...

Is reversal of early stage pc possible?

grade early stage prostate cancer in 2018. and since then I’ve had three MRIs and one biopsy. The...

Perineurial invasion with stage 2 prostate cancer

I am 67 and just received my path report. Stage 2, Gleason 3+4=7 and says perineurial invasion...