Good News?: Over 2 years ago I was... - Prostate Cancer N...

Prostate Cancer Network

4,933 members3,071 posts

Good News?

boxmk profile image
16 Replies

Over 2 years ago I was diagnosed with Prostate Cancer. Gleason of 3 + 3. Have been on active surveillance and have PSA tested every 3 months. My PSA levels range around 5 - 6 with a high 6 months ago at 6.99. My latest PSA came back at less than .1 which is my lowest score ever. Has a miracle happened? What should I make of this?

Written by
boxmk profile image
boxmk
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
Read more about...
16 Replies
alwayslooking profile image
alwayslooking

Get another test to confirm.

Roger2Dodger profile image
Roger2Dodger

Yes, another test to confirm!

cpcohen profile image
cpcohen

Even a normal prostate will give you PSA levels higher than 0.1 .

. . . I'd repeat the test.

. Charles

Jt2ceo profile image
Jt2ceo

Retest

AlanMeyer profile image
AlanMeyerModerator

As others indicated, this is really an impossible result. It sounds like your PSA sample got mixed up with someone else's at the lab. Hopefully, that fellow, with a <0.1 PSA didn't get your result - which would scare the hell out of him.

Alan

skillmk profile image
skillmk in reply to AlanMeyer

LOL! (but true)

boxmk profile image
boxmk

Thanks everyone for your comments. More to come after discussing with Doc.

boxmk profile image
boxmk

Had another PSA....5.41. Lower then my previous test but definitely higher and more believable then the the one done last Friday.

Jt2ceo profile image
Jt2ceo

Get a biopsy

rickcricow profile image
rickcricow in reply to Jt2ceo

He had at least one biopsy, he's reporting Gleason scores.

And he's on active surveillance. I have a similiar history and I'm biopsied every 2 years.

Jt2ceo profile image
Jt2ceo in reply to rickcricow

I lasted 6 years on watchful waiting. My PSA stayed around 4 to 5 but my byopsy results got to 4/4 and below . I then had brachi, radiation and 6 months of hormones. Doing well now.

Umpire20 profile image
Umpire20 in reply to Jt2ceo

Good for you opting for what I prefer to call Active Surveillance! I've been on Active Surveillance since Dec06 diagnosis and am not doing Watchful WAITING...for the Other Shoe to Drop.

boxmk profile image
boxmk in reply to rickcricow

My next biopsy is scheduled for December with a MRI.

Umpire20 profile image
Umpire20 in reply to rickcricow

I have been on Active Surveillance since Dec06 diagnosis. Had three biopsies. Last one in November 2010. Not a big proponent of multiple biopsies. PSA stands at 0.8. I am now 70 years young.

Umpire20 profile image
Umpire20

Congratulations on your "miracle "! I have been on Active Surveillance since Dec06 diagnosis with Gleason 6 (3+3) when it was 2 of 12 cores at 10% or less with PSA of 4.2. My PSA in Feb17 was 0.8. Studies have shown Exercise benefits seemingly curing low-grade non-aggressive Indolent disease!

Umpire20 profile image
Umpire20

Sorry for these multiple posts. I thought I was responding in different threads. If you have Gleason 6 PcA and are considering Active Surveillance give me a ring at JSimmsfun@yahoo.com

You may also like...

Good news, not so good news...

news about prostate cancer, the second leading cause of cancer death in men. The prostate cancer...

Good news from RO

favorable prostate cancer.\\" He said there are 5 points that qualify me for \\"Active...

Good news for those who want an mpMRI before a first biopsy

situations (e.g., rising PSA after a first negative biopsy, active surveillance, recurrence after...

Good outcomes and experience with Eastern US SBRT, LDR, HDR centers?

capsular abutment but no ECE and Prostate Volume 40mL. Latest PSA 5 months after biopsy now 7.4....

Not happy I'm here, but it's good to be here!

Hello. I was diagnosed in 2010 at the age of 44. Gleason score 3+4, downgraded to 3+3. I opted for...