Article in daily mail suggesting women sh... - Healthy Evidence

Healthy Evidence

3,059 members438 posts

Article in daily mail suggesting women should be induced at 37 weeks?

Preggo profile image
3 Replies

Article in today's daily mail suggesting that research from Denmark shows a halving of neonatal deaths and cutting of cerebral palsy rates by a quarter where labour is induced at 37 weeks.

Please can we have analysis of this study by Behind theHeadlines or similar?

This is pretty alarming and major stuff. It was a large study, but I haven't read it.

It would be helpful if a full analysis could be given as I'm concerned how influential this might be to advice organisations, let alone NHS policies or discussions with professionals, potentially. Already Count the Kicks has posted it on their facebook page suggesting the article accurately reflects the outcome of the study (note they have linked to the article, not the study). Count the Kicks is highly respected and people may start requesting induction or c-sections based on what they appear to support.

The findings are published in BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology.

Read more: dailymail.co.uk/news/articl...

Written by
Preggo profile image
Preggo
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
Read more about...
3 Replies
Penel profile image
Penel

This review from The Royal College of Midwives may be helpful. There is a link to the Danish study at the end of the article.

rcm.org.uk/news-views-and-a...

Preggo profile image
Preggo in reply to Penel

Thank you, that's great!

Alex_Thompson profile image
Alex_Thompson

Hi Preggo, we put this to Dr Dimitrios Siassakos (University of Bristol) and here is his response:

"The article actually shows that the introduction of proactive induction of labour from 37 weeks was associated with improvement in some important outcomes, including the reduction of the neonatal death rate. Proactive induction essentially was the induction of labour for a valid medical reason as per NICE guidelines. Please note:

A detailed look at the findings shows that the main difference after the introduction of the NICE guideline to Denmark, where the study took place, was that there were fewer babies born after 42 weeks. It appears that a lot of the impact of the introduction of the proactive labour policy might have been through inducing labour in women to achieve birth by 42 weeks and not by inducing everyone at 37 weeks."

You may also like...

What's the truth about fats? Daily Mail article 23/09/14

dietitians think about this article?...

ENERGY HEALING& AYurvedic Healing

of Dr Eric Pearl...While studying Chinese, I tired various remedies and read a lot....And while...

Blood Test for Depression and Efficacy of CBT?

hope they still might. Daily Mail:...

I'm new here, possibility of cancer & how to make my gp take me seriously?

affected my A-level exams, and now my university studies. What can I say to my doctor or do to get...