5:2 intermittent calorie restriction - Fasting and Furious

Fasting and Furious

1,163 members421 posts

5:2 intermittent calorie restriction

S11m profile image
S11mVolunteer 70lb IF20
8 Replies

Dr Michael Mosely's 5:2 diet is not Intermittent Fasting (well - not much more than not eating while you are asleep).

Eating 500 or 600 calories a day will prevent autophagy and most of the benefits of Intermittent Fasting. Does he suggest you eat all your "fast day" calories in one meal? Fasting One Meal A Day (OMAD) which would be beneficial.

Fasting (e.g. 36 hours) two days a week would be effective - but you might want to get into "fat-burning mode" before trying it.

Have any of your tried 5:2 - and what were your experiences?

I fast two days a month. This is a 68 hour fast, as I normally fast 20:4 - and 20 + 48 is 68!

Written by
S11m profile image
S11m
Volunteer 70lb IF20
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
8 Replies
S11m profile image
S11mVolunteer 70lb IF20

I would not want to dissuade anyone from Intermittent Fasting - and I would like them to use strategies that work better.

S11m profile image
S11mVolunteer 70lb IF20

"most of the benefits of fasting occur within 14-16 hours"

This is not actually the case - most studies indicate that most of the benefits of fasting START within 14-16 hours - so a 20-hour fast might give you double the benefit of a 16 hour fast - and OMAD ¿22 hours? would give you even more. I am now on my monthly 68-hour fast.

The number of hours into a fast when the different benefits start differs greatly between individuals and has been the subject of a few research projects - but Dr Mindy Pelz says that there is no way of measuring autophagy (some have tried), but her Fasting Benefits Chart shows that the benefits of a 36-hour fast are an order of magnitude more than for a 20 hour fast.

See:

healthunlocked.com/fasting-...

I tried 5:2 for three weeks and found it totally ineffective. Much too much annoyance for zero benefit.

S11m profile image
S11mVolunteer 70lb IF20 in reply to

Yes, Hidden - one of the benefits of the IF/LCHF scheme is that you do not need to count anything.

in reply to S11m

It was frustrating, but especially since everyone and their dog seemed to lose weight effortlessly doing it. :( I think proper fasting was easier to do too, compared to the low calorie day.

Adaboo profile image
Adaboo

I tried 5:2 a few years ago and ate 500 cals just once a day. Me and hubby lost weight and felt ok. I am now doing 16/8 daily and low carb. My weight is now perfect and I don’t want to lose more but I’m not sure a couple of 24 hr fasts would be better that the daily 16-8?

S11m profile image
S11mVolunteer 70lb IF20 in reply to Adaboo

I am also at my target weight - and on low (or medium) carb.

I do 20/4 almost every day, and a 68 hour fast every four weeks. Perhaps, occasionally you could extend your 16-hour fast by 24 hours -making a 40-hour fast?

Adaboo profile image
Adaboo in reply to S11m

I’m low/ medium carb too, can’t do keto. I seem to have between 50-70 grams a day. I’m going to try a 24 hour one as maybe the higher fat will keep me from feeling sick 🤞. I’ll then try to extend it if it goes ok. I take my hat off to you for going 68 hours!

You may also like...

Diabetes type 2 obesity and Intermittent fasting.

our year and growing. Fasting can help some people lose weight and prevention is better than cure...

intermittent fasting for women, ♀︎

guide to intermittent fasting for females as it explains how your hormones change so your body will

Tips for Intermittent Fasting on holiday ⛱ 😎

what you eat and when so you can have treats but there is nothing to gain by over eating or eating...

Monthly Group Fast: May/June Fast

If you are already intermittent fasting, then 36 hours is a good next step: no eating for a day + 2

CKD and Intermittent Fasting safety?

Stage 2 CKD. Looking for information about intermittent fasting safety. Was surprised I couldn’t...