Israel approves third dose for immunocompromised - CLL Support

CLL Support

22,510 members38,657 posts

Israel approves third dose for immunocompromised

Youngen profile image
30 Replies

They finally gave the approval! Will speak with my specialist tomorrow to discuss risk/benefit of pausing Ibrutinib to get the best chances of a response. Fingers crossed!

timesofisrael.com/liveblog_...

Written by
Youngen profile image
Youngen
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
Read more about...
30 Replies
Justasheet1 profile image
Justasheet1

I wonder if it will be a third of the same or a different brand vaccine?

Youngen profile image
Youngen in reply to Justasheet1

We are 99.9% Pfizer and do have some inventory of moderna but that hasn’t been used on citizens to date. Unfortunately it will be mRNA in any case

Justasheet1 profile image
Justasheet1 in reply to Youngen

Do you feel that the J&J would be more efficacious?

Youngen profile image
Youngen in reply to Justasheet1

I do, but there is none in the country. Israel had an exclusivity deal with Pfizer with a small amount from moderna. Under the circumstances, I won’t take the risk of getting on an international flight right now so my options are limited

Justasheet1 profile image
Justasheet1 in reply to Youngen

I just read Pfizer is recommending a third of theirs and it increases the antibodies 5-10 fold. No mention of mixing vaccines though I know most people think that’s the way to go.

foxnews.com/health/pfizer-m...

Youngen profile image
Youngen in reply to Justasheet1

Yes- they are basing their recommendation in part, based on the fact that we are seeing about 40% of cases being vaccinated. Keep in mind that we were mostly vaccinated in dec-feb and the antibodies appear to be reducing significantly

google.com/amp/s/www.market...

Justasheet1 profile image
Justasheet1 in reply to Youngen

Youngen,

Thanks for the info. I really would love a third shot but am still without guidance from my CLL expert in this.

I would love his insight on which vaccine to get and for how long I need to pause my ibrutinib for. I don’t want to create a problem trying to solve another one.

I guess I’m gonna have to wait for the

cajunjeff clinical trial to end 😎

Jeff

Youngen profile image
Youngen in reply to Justasheet1

Absolutely! I am Following the trial of one closely too. Waiting to discuss the risks of stopping Ibrutinib and also- chances of a better vaccine response. If they are not significant I am not sure I want to rock the boat since my CLL is finally stable now. We know that many patients with CLL in W&W also didn’t develop antibodies so wondering if it’s worth taking the gamble with the treatment pause.

809123 profile image
809123 in reply to Youngen

I asked my consultant about stopping prior and after the 3rd vaccine. He was uncomfortable because I have only been on Ibrutinib for 8 months.

LeoPa profile image
LeoPa in reply to Youngen

Is it reasonable to expect high levels of antibodies in the blood 6 months after an infection? I thought memory cells were supposed to remain and the immune system would be able to ramp up production of them in no time in case needed. Do we have still high levels of antibodies to the vaccines we received during our lives? Probably not. Why would this be different?

AussieNeil profile image
AussieNeilAdministrator in reply to LeoPa

How long antibodies for a specific illness last depends on the illness, how those antibodies were developed and subsequent stimuli. There are specific antibody tests to check the immunoglobulin titre for given infections. Antibodies from COVID-19 vaccinations have been found to last for at least 6 months:webmd.com/coronavirus-in-co...

Newly produced (or infused) IgG has a half life of 21 days. CD20 monoclonal antibodies (rituximab, obinutuzumab and ofatumumab) can be detected in our circulation up to a year after our last infusion.

If we can make adequate amounts of antibodies to our vaccinations, I don't see why we shouldn't expect similar coverage over time, but I would think the bigger concern is how effective those antibodies would be against new variants. Perhaps it is unrealistic to expect stimulus from similar spike proteins in other respiratory viruses if we take steps to avoid our risk of exposure.

Neil

neurodervish profile image
neurodervish in reply to Youngen

I'm still trying to wrap my head around all this. Is there a mechanism for why the J&J (adenovirus vaccine) might be more efficacious over the mRNA for CLLers? My brain hurts!

Youngen profile image
Youngen in reply to neurodervish

Right?? So confusing and since it’s all so new- it’s all theoretical at this point and nobody really knows much for sure! There is a theory that mixing mRNA technology with the classic vaccine technology will trigger a stronger response. But- we don’t know how much stronger and how that would affect immunocompromised with CLL, let alone on treatments which further inhibit enzymes needed to develop antibodies 🤦🏻‍♀️

JigFettler profile image
JigFettlerVolunteer in reply to neurodervish

Ive not seen anything wrt this. It maybe one vacc mode suits CLL better than another - cant believe thats known tho'.

CLL being so heterogeneous unlikely a one size fits all best fit will be found IMO.

Jig

Youngen profile image
Youngen in reply to Justasheet1

Confirmed that they are only providing Pfizer. WHO just came out against mixing providers. At this point- I will take what I can get

DanBro1 profile image
DanBro1 in reply to Youngen

WHO is voicing an "opinion". There is no basis in fact for their comments. WHO is strictly a bunch of government bureaucrats getting paid for doing nothing. WHO does not contribute anything other than misinformation. Look at their performance in China - they were and are "clueless". The FDA in the US just spread misinformation and warned against the J&J vaccine saying SIX cases of severe reaction have occurred out of THIRTEEN MILLION administered shots and that the sky is falling. Yet J&J has shown that a booster of their vaccine will increase your immunity to Covid-19 by over 500 to 1000 percent!! This is what happens when you have unelected government bureaucrats setting policy.

Youngen profile image
Youngen in reply to DanBro1

Not disagreeing about WHO but I would prefer not to mix providers unless there is specific guidance/data supporting it. Regardless- not relevant for me since Pfizer is all we have available to us

DanBro1 profile image
DanBro1 in reply to Youngen

There is no data supporting to mix or not to mix vaccines. I had two Moderna shots and plan on requesting a J&J shot when I complete my CLL treatments. Trying to cover all my bases, so to speak.

Youngen profile image
Youngen in reply to DanBro1

The clinical trial of antibodies in CLL patients showed that some (albeit a minority) did develop antibodies while on treatment. What treatment are you on?

DanBro1 profile image
DanBro1 in reply to Youngen

Six months of monthly IV Obinutuzumab coupled with one year daily Venclexta.... I have six months to go and I will be finished with the meds.

Youngen profile image
Youngen in reply to DanBro1

Good luck!!! 🍀

Jm954 profile image
Jm954Administrator in reply to DanBro1

Not true DanBro1 - recent studies have supported mixing vaccines Youngen

nature.com/articles/d41586-...

nature.com/articles/d41586-...

ox.ac.uk/news/2021-06-28-mi...

Jackie

Jm954 profile image
Jm954Administrator in reply to DanBro1

I agree the WHO have been completely inept at every step but surely unelected and apolitical experts are better than elected representatives who have no idea about the science and a political party line to follow.

Remember that this is a rapidly evolving situation and that information or declarations from even a month ago may no longer hold true.

Jackie

bennevisplace profile image
bennevisplace

Thanks. Do you know anything about clinical trials behind this decision, and whether they included immunocompromised subjects? Also how does Israel's regulatory system work in this case?

Youngen profile image
Youngen in reply to bennevisplace

The third dose was approved as a broad study. They only approved it for certain categories of immunocompromised patients (blood cancers, transplant patients, HIV and a few other groups) and they will consider adding additional groups in the future. We are getting it at teaching hospital and will take part in an antibody study being conducted by them.

kathymac5252 profile image
kathymac5252

our US cancer specialist /researcher said that there was not enough data yet to warrant a 3rd dose...she said we would know more in the next two months....

Youngen profile image
Youngen in reply to kathymac5252

Here the third dose was only approved for a subset of immunocompromised people and not for a broader population

kathymac5252 profile image
kathymac5252 in reply to Youngen

My husband is immune compromised as well....low neutrophils and low WBC....our doctor is still paying attention to the trials and data that is slowly amassing....we are being so careful still

Youngen profile image
Youngen in reply to kathymac5252

Even after a third dose (assuming I develop antibodies) I will continue being very cautious as we are seeing a lot more vaccinated people getting COVID. Keep your eyes open for studies from israel about a third dose specifically in CLL patients!

kathymac5252 profile image
kathymac5252 in reply to Youngen

I will.....Israel is doing some great research...

You may also like...

Vaccine safety, Boosters and the Third dose of COVID Vaccine explained for UK patients

after the immunocompromised have received their third dose....

Covid Vaccine for Immunocompromised

Mother 93 has liver cancer, has had her first Covid vaccination and her second due first week in...

Norvovirus and CLL/immunocompromised

Ronapreve - Immunocompromised patients

administered to immunocompromised patients, covid negative, who have not mounted an antibody...

Sending love to all affected by the war in Israel

not escalate. May this war end soon. May you be protected until it does end. May peace...